Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42311156›Full record

ArticleBJPsych open2026

Psychedelics, the media portrayal and large-language model evaluations.

Catherine L Clelland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJPsych open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Catherine L ClellandPsychiatry, https://ror.org/00hj8s172Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9364-3974

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychedelics were used for centuries in healing and spiritual rituals, long before the mid-20th century when they became subjects of biomedical research. Although initial trials generated optimism, these were quickly overshadowed by sensationalist media coverage and political backlash. Following decades of inactivity, research on compounds including 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) has resurged, along with the media attention. Investigating this growing interest, Bender et al employed a large-language model, validated against human raters, to analyse 25 years of media articles (2000-2025), quantifying trends in sentiment towards psychedelic therapies. Findings showed a dramatic increase in coverage, with positive sentiment peaking in 2020 followed by a significant decline from 2024, coinciding with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's decision not to approve MDMA-assisted therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder, and echoing the dynamics of the 1960s. The authors emphasise that sustained progress in the field will require reliance on scientific evidence to advance therapeutic applications.

Indexed as

History of psychiatrypolicypsychedelicspsychiatry and lawpsychopharmacology

Identifiers

PMID42311156
PMCPMC13276765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.