ArticleThe Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology2026
Dispensing of Antiemetics During Pregnancy in Aotearoa New Zealand, 2005-2020.
Article in The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAntiemetic use during pregnancy is rising in high-income countries. Increasing use of antiemetics has also been documented in Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ); however, the specific antiemetics dispensed have not been reported.
aimTo describe patterns of antiemetic dispensing during pregnancy in NZ, 2005-2020. MATERIALS AND
methodsCommunity-based antiemetic dispensings were linked with 1.37 million pregnancies in the New Zealand Pregnancy Cohort. The proportions of pregnancies in which there was at least one dispensing of any and of specific antiemetics were calculated for each trimester and calendar year. Maternal characteristics and the sequence in which unique antiemetic regimens were introduced were described for pregnancies with first trimester exposure.
resultsFirst trimester antiemetic exposure increased from 4.1% to 19.7% of pregnancies between 2005 and 2019. Although metoclopramide was the most commonly dispensed antiemetic during Trimester 1 in all years (increasing from 3.1% to 12.4%), there was a substantial increase in ondansetron dispensing (0.1% to 9.1%). Ondansetron users were more likely than metoclopramide users to be European/Other and have a hospital admission for hyperemesis gravidarum. Metoclopramide and ondansetron monotherapy were first-line regimens in 70.0% and 1.9% of pregnancies with Trimester 1 exposure between 2005 and 2010 versus 46.5% and 26.5% between 2016 and 2020.
conclusionsOndansetron dispensing increased substantially over time. Further exploration of the context of ondansetron prescribing in NZ is warranted, as is further research into potential adverse outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.