Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42310912›Full record

ArticleJournal of minimally invasive surgery2026

Minimally invasive surgery in the elderly population in Korea: temporal trends across major abdominal surgeries.

Kyung Sik Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of minimally invasive surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Kyung Sik KimDepartment of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9498-284X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Korea's rapid transition toward a super-aged society has markedly increased the demand for major abdominal surgery in older adults. Although minimally invasive surgery (MIS) provides perioperative advantages, including reduced surgical trauma, lower blood loss, and accelerated postoperative recovery, it also introduces pathophysiological challenges that require preoperative evaluation and risk stratification. This presidential lecture summarizes trends in geriatric surgery in Korea, highlights perioperative considerations for elderly patients undergoing MIS, and presents longitudinal outcomes from Severance Hospital. Surgical trends and perioperative outcomes were evaluated for major abdominal procedures, including gastrectomy, colectomy, major hepatectomy, and pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), in patients aged ≥70 years. Analyses demonstrated a progressive transition from open surgery toward minimally invasive approaches. Laparoscopic and robotic techniques have become the predominant approaches for gastrectomy and colectomy, including in octogenarians, while MIS adoption for complex procedures, such as major hepatectomy and PD, has also expanded substantially. Comparative analyses within this elderly cohort demonstrated that MIS was associated with superior perioperative outcomes compared with open surgery, including significantly reduced estimated blood loss, shorter hospitalization, and lower rates of clinically significant complications, such as postoperative pancreatic fistula, without compromising procedural safety. Advances in surgical technology and accumulated institutional expertise have established MIS as a feasible, standardized approach for major abdominal surgery in older adults. Integrating comprehensive preoperative assessment, particularly frailty screening, with the selective application of MIS may represent the optimal strategy for reducing operative risk and promoting postoperative functional recovery in geriatric surgical care.

Indexed as

Aged 80 and overFrail elderlyGeriatric assessmentMinimally invasive surgical procedures

Identifiers

PMID42310912
PMCPMC13279652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.