ArticleJournal of the science of food and agriculture2026
How psychological distance shapes ecological farming: cognitive-social mechanisms in smallholder decision-making.
Article in Journal of the science of food and agriculture, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGlobal agriculture is facing a contradiction between production improvement and ecological protection. Ecological farming is essential for China's smallholder-dominated green transition, but a large gap remains between policy goals and actual farmer behavior. Traditional studies over-rely on static cognitive models and treat ecological farming behaviors (EFBs) as homogeneous, lacking exploration of dynamic cognitive antecedents and heterogeneous decision mechanisms. This study integrates construal level theory, agricultural economic rationality, and social norm theory to build a 'psychological distance-perception risk-perception benefit-social norms-EFB' framework, with the aim of revealing the cognitive-social driving mechanisms of smallholders' EFBs.
resultsBased on a survey of 867 smallholders in Henan Province and partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) estimation, hypothetical distance was found to promote EFBs significantly and positively, whereas temporal and spatial distances showed no significant direct effect. Perceived risk and perceived benefit acted as competing mediators: perceived risk drove EFBs significantly, whereas perceived benefit had a significant negative effect. Driving mechanisms differed sharply across behaviors: fertilizer and pesticide reduction were motivated mainly by perceived risk whereas conservation tillage was driven by perceived benefit. Informal social norms significantly inhibited pesticide reduction, indicating a collective risk-avoidance dilemma.
conclusionThis study confirmed that psychological distance can be an underlying cognitive antecedent of farmers' ecological decisions and identifies various pathways for different EFBs. The results help to explain the conflict between smallholders' short-term economic rationality and long-term ecological sustainability. Policies should shorten hypothetical distance via localized and concrete communication, adopt differentiated interventions for various practices, and promote village-level unified prevention, supporting precise and effective farmland ecological governance. © 2026 Society of Chemical Industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.