ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2026
The Effect of the Temporal Position of a Gap on Its Automatic Detection.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Effect of the Temporal Position of a Gap on Its Automatic Detection.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The presentation of a rarely occurring auditory stimulus that contains a silent interval (or gap) among a sequence of frequently occurring stimuli that do not contain a gap can elicit a negative-going event-related potential known as the deviant-related negativity (DRN). This study investigated how the temporal position of the gap (i.e., temporal distance from stimulus onset) influences DRN amplitude using a novel multideviant paradigm. Seventeen young adults were presented with a sequence in which six gap deviants alternated with a standard stimulus. The standard stimulus was a 500-ms duration white noise burst. The deviants were constructed by inserting a gap in six different temporal positions, ranging from 15 to 400 ms after stimulus onset. In different conditions, gap duration was either 10 or 30 ms. Participants were also presented with single-deviant sequences in which the gap occurred at 100 or 300 ms. The amplitude of the DRN was larger for 30 ms than for 10-ms duration gaps; however, it was much reduced for gaps occurring at 300 or 400 ms after stimulus onset. There was no significant difference in DRN amplitude between the multideviant and single-deviant paradigms. These results confirm the hypothesis that auditory integration occurs within a limited temporal window of less than 300 ms. Moreover, the multideviant paradigm elicited DRN responses of comparable amplitude to those in the single-deviant paradigm, highlighting its potential as an efficient tool for assessing temporal processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.