Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42310795›Full record

ArticleAnatomical sciences education2026

The human foundations of anatomy at The University of Sydney: One hundred and one years of body procurement.

Rebekah A Jenkin, Kevin A Keay

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Anatomical sciences education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rebekah A JenkinSchool of Medical Sciences (Anatomy), Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8071-9183
Kevin A KeaySchool of Medical Sciences (Anatomy), Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3934-4380

Funding

NWG Macintosh Memorial Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Body procurement at The University of Sydney has a long history. Anatomy legislation (1881 Anatomy Act) modeled on the British Anatomy Act 1832 legalized procurement of unclaimed bodies from public institutions for anatomical dissection at licensed Schools of Anatomy, effectively conferring the University of Sydney an exclusive license until the 1960s. This study documents the procurement of 7609 bodies between 1883 and 1983, of which 4084 were unclaimed. Until the 1930s, bodies were predominantly from public asylums, with a small number from psychiatric asylums, hospitals and morgues. Donors were uncommon as were female bodies, reflecting prevailing societal antipathy toward anatomical dissection, the characteristics of asylum residents, and academic attitudes to the dissection of the female body. The individuals whose bodies sustained medical education were diverse in origin and circumstances: ex-convicts, immigrants, miners, Chinese indentured laborers, Indigenous Australians and locally born individuals. Although the law provided a limited right of objection, asylum residents were poorly positioned to exercise it. Mirroring practice across the Western World, their classification as "unclaimed" reflected legal procedure and poverty, institutionalization, separation from family, discriminatory and inaccurate record-keeping, and Colonial-era assumptions of social worth. Little consideration was given to their cultural beliefs, preferences and rights. The University shifted to a body donation program in the 1940s as the availability of unclaimed bodies diminished. This shift was rapid; the last unclaimed body was received in 1961.

Indexed as

AnatomyDissectionSchools, MedicalTissue and Organ ProcurementTissue DonorsAustraliaCadaverFemaleHistory, 19th CenturyHistory, 20th CenturyHumansMaleNew South WalesRefugeesUniversitiesanatomy educationasylumsbody donationbody procurementconsent

Identifiers

PMID42310795
PMCPMC13545325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.