ArticleAnatomical sciences education2026
The human foundations of anatomy at The University of Sydney: One hundred and one years of body procurement.
Article in Anatomical sciences education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The human foundations of anatomy at The University of Sydney: One hundred and one years of body procurement.Anatomical sciences education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Body procurement at The University of Sydney has a long history. Anatomy legislation (1881 Anatomy Act) modeled on the British Anatomy Act 1832 legalized procurement of unclaimed bodies from public institutions for anatomical dissection at licensed Schools of Anatomy, effectively conferring the University of Sydney an exclusive license until the 1960s. This study documents the procurement of 7609 bodies between 1883 and 1983, of which 4084 were unclaimed. Until the 1930s, bodies were predominantly from public asylums, with a small number from psychiatric asylums, hospitals and morgues. Donors were uncommon as were female bodies, reflecting prevailing societal antipathy toward anatomical dissection, the characteristics of asylum residents, and academic attitudes to the dissection of the female body. The individuals whose bodies sustained medical education were diverse in origin and circumstances: ex-convicts, immigrants, miners, Chinese indentured laborers, Indigenous Australians and locally born individuals. Although the law provided a limited right of objection, asylum residents were poorly positioned to exercise it. Mirroring practice across the Western World, their classification as "unclaimed" reflected legal procedure and poverty, institutionalization, separation from family, discriminatory and inaccurate record-keeping, and Colonial-era assumptions of social worth. Little consideration was given to their cultural beliefs, preferences and rights. The University shifted to a body donation program in the 1940s as the availability of unclaimed bodies diminished. This shift was rapid; the last unclaimed body was received in 1961.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.