Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42310788›Full record

ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2026

Co-development of a genetic care pathway for ALS: real-world perspectives from the North of England.

Clementine Wood, Georgia Brown, Kirsten Chalk, Samantha Holden Smith, Hayley Williams, Greg Broadhurst, John Ealing, Hisham Hamdalla, Catherine Breen, Rhona Macleod and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Clementine WoodWarrington Hospital. Lovely Ln, Warrington, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-0332-1793
Georgia BrownManchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Trust, Manchester, UK.
Kirsten ChalkManchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Trust, Manchester, UK.
Samantha Holden SmithManchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Hospital, Northern Care Alliance, Manchester, UK.
Hayley WilliamsManchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Hospital, Northern Care Alliance, Manchester, UK.
Greg BroadhurstMotor Neurone Disease Association, Frances Crick House, Moulton Park, Northampton, UK.
John EalingManchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Hospital, Northern Care Alliance, Manchester, UK.
Hisham HamdallaManchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Hospital, Northern Care Alliance, Manchester, UK.
Catherine BreenManchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Trust, Manchester, UK.
Rhona MacleodManchester Centre for Genomic Medicine, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Trust, Manchester, UK.
Amina ChaouchManchester Centre for Clinical Neurosciences, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Hospital, Northern Care Alliance, Manchester, UK. amina.chaouch@manchester.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a rare, progressive neurodegenerative disorder, with a substantial proportion of cases attributed to genetic factors. Recent advances in gene discovery and genomic technologies have transformed ALS care by enabling genomic testing to inform prognosis, assess familial risk, and facilitate access to novel therapies. However, guidance on the delivery of genetic testing and counselling in ALS remains limited, leading to variability in clinical practice. In response, the Manchester Motor Neuron Disease (MND) Care Centre and the Manchester Centre for Genomic Medicine co-developed a structured genetic care pathway for ALS, drawing on real-world data, patient engagement, and multidisciplinary collaboration.

resultsA retrospective evaluation of 326 ALS patients at the Manchester MND Care Centre identified significant variability in genetic testing uptake, counselling practices, and record-keeping. Patient survey and engagement sessions revealed uncertainty regarding key genetic concepts and inconsistent recall of pre- and post-test discussions. Priorities for improvement included clearer communication, standardised discussions, and enhanced support for families following genetic findings. Consequently, the Greater Manchester ALS Genetic Testing Pathway was developed by a multidisciplinary team, incorporating consensus-based steps for patient identification, pre-test conversations, consent, testing, results disclosure, and post-test support. This pathway integrates genetic testing into routine ALS care, clarifies team responsibilities, and establishes a framework for ongoing evaluation using key performance indicators. Patient and staff feedback is used to support continuous improvement.

conclusionsThe co-developed ALS genetic testing pathway provides a scalable model for standardising genomic care in mainstream clinical settings. By establishing clear processes for genetics discussions, consent, and follow-up, the pathway seeks to improve equity, transparency, and person-centred care. Ongoing evaluation and collaboration with patients, clinicians, and genetic services are essential to ensure the pathway remains responsive to scientific advances and evolving patient needs. Wider adoption of structured genetic pathways may facilitate the integration of genomics into care for rare diseases across healthcare systems.

Indexed as

Amyotrophic Lateral SclerosisEnglandGenetic TestingHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesAmyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)Care pathwayGenomic testingMotor neuron disease (MND)

Identifiers

PMID42310788
PMCPMC13528026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.