ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2026
Relevance of functional studies for assessing an antisense oligonucleotide-mediated exon skipping therapeutic strategy for mucolipidosis type II.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMucolipidosis type II (ML II) is a lysosomal storage disorder caused by deficiency of N-acetylglucosamine-1-phosphotransferase (GlcNAc-PT), which impairs the trafficking of lysosomal hydrolases. Of all ML II pathogenic variants, c.3503_3504del in GNPTAB exon 19 is the most prevalent, therefore constituting a compelling molecular target for the development of personalized therapeutic strategies. Here, we explored the feasibility of an innovative RNA based-therapeutic strategy using antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) designed to induce exon 19 skipping in GNPTAB pre-mRNA. This approach was previously successfully tested at the mRNA level in fibroblasts from ML II patients, where it generated an in-frame mRNA. In the present study, our aim was to evaluate whether GNPTAB exon 19 skipping could increase GlcNAc-PT levels and consequently improve the cellular phenotype of ML II patients carrying this pathogenic variant. To address this, we designed a functional approach based on the overexpression of a GNPTAB construct carrying the exon 19 deletion enabling the indirect evaluation of the resulting protein´s functionality.
resultsOur first results demonstrated that in ML II fibroblasts, ASO treatment led to a modest increase in lysosomal hydrolase activity at 24 h and 48 h. Moreover, LAMP-1 expression remained elevated and comparable to untreated ML II cells, indicating that GlcNAc-PT activity was not restored. To further investigate the functional relevance of exon 19 skipping, overexpression studies were performed in HEK293T cells. Three constructs (pGNPTAB WT, pGNPTAB del_exon19 and pGNPTAB c.3503_3504del) were expressed. Both pGNPTAB WT and pGNPTAB del_exon19 constructs produced the α/β-precursor. However, only the WT construct generated the mature β-subunit, whereas the pGNPTAB c.3503_3504del construct showed no detectable expression. These findings indicate that exon 19 is essential for proper GlcNAc-PT processing and enzymatic activity.
conclusionsAlthough ASO treatment corrected splicing at the mRNA level, it did not restore GlcNAc-PT activity in ML II patient cells. Nonetheless, our findings clarify the functional importance of exon 19 and demonstrate that overexpression of an exon-skipped construct provides a simple and effective strategy to indirectly assess protein functionality, supporting the prioritization of this kind of approach to test an exon-skipping ASO-based approach before advancing to studies in patient-derived cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.