Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42310761›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2026

Taxonomy-aware, disorder-matched benchmarking of phase-separating protein predictors.

Shuang Hou, Hexin Shen, Yong Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shuang Hou *State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Diseases and Medical Innovation Center, Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, Shanghai East Hospital, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Signaling and Disease Research, Frontier Science Center for Stem Cell Research, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Hexin Shen *State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Diseases and Medical Innovation Center, Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, Shanghai East Hospital, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Signaling and Disease Research, Frontier Science Center for Stem Cell Research, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Yong ZhangState Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Diseases and Medical Innovation Center, Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Department of Neurosurgery, Shanghai East Hospital, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Signaling and Disease Research, Frontier Science Center for Stem Cell Research, School of Life Sciences and Technology, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China. yzhang@tongji.edu.cn.

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2024M762403National Key Research and Development Program of China 2021YFA1302500National Natural Science Foundation of China 32325012, 32488101Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality 23JS1401200Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality 24YF2734900
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBiomolecular condensates formed via liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) play vital roles in cellular organization and function. Computational prediction of phase-separating proteins (PSPs) is increasingly used to prioritize candidates at proteome scale, making robust, well-designed benchmarks essential for fair evaluation and iterative improvement of PSP predictors.

resultsWe first show that a recently released PSP benchmark is substantially confounded by the imbalances in taxonomic origin and intrinsic-disorder compositions between positive and negative sets, allowing predictors to achieve high apparent performance by exploiting non-LLPS shortcuts and obscuring their true ability to distinguish PSPs. To minimize these effects, we construct a taxonomy-aware, disorder-matched PSP benchmark. Using this benchmark, we find that absolute sequence and biophysical feature values of PSPs differ markedly across taxa, whereas LLPS-associated feature shifts relative to taxon-specific proteome backgrounds are comparatively conserved. Benchmarking nineteen PSP predictors under this framework reveals pronounced taxon-dependent variation in performance. Moreover, PSPs lacking intrinsically disordered regions consistently constitute a more challenging regime across methods, motivating routine disorder-stratified evaluation.

conclusionsOur taxonomy-aware, disorder-matched benchmarking framework reduces shortcut-driven biases, enables more interpretable evaluation of PSP predictors, and provides guidance for developing models that capture transferable LLPS-associated signals rather than dataset- or taxon-specific shortcuts.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyIntrinsically Disordered ProteinsProteinsBenchmarkingPhase SeparationPrediction AlgorithmsProteomeIntrinsically Disordered ProteinsProteinsProteomeBenchmarkingPhase-separating proteinsPSP predictorsTaxonomy-aware evaluation

Identifiers

PMID42310761
PMCPMC13508433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.