ArticleBMC health services research2026
'Telehealth for all': capitalising on the power of virtual healthcare for persons with disability in India.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionVirtual healthcare holds significant potential to advance inclusive healthcare for persons with disabilities in India, supporting the World Health Organization's goal of Universal Health Coverage. However, individuals with disabilities often face barriers to accessing virtual healthcare due to a lack of disability-inclusive infrastructure, technology, and operational support, which further limits equitable service delivery. This study aimed to investigate the experiences of persons with disabilities and their caregivers regarding virtual healthcare services in India. The focus was on assessing the accessibility, availability, acceptability, and quality (AAAQ) of these services.
methodsData were collected through 20 in-depth interviews and five focus group discussions with persons with vision, hearing, physical, and intellectual disabilities, as well as their caregivers, across geographically diverse regions of India. Participants were recruited using a snowball sampling method, and thematic analysis was applied to identify key patterns and barriers.
resultsThe findings revealed that while virtual healthcare platforms offered convenience and reduced travel burdens for persons with disability, significant barriers persisted. Challenges included limited accessibility of digital platforms for screen readers, inconsistent availability of sign language interpreters, and insufficient disability-specific training for healthcare providers. Public platforms like eSanjeevani remained underutilized due to low awareness and usability issues. DISCUSSION: This study emphasizes the need for disability-inclusive design and service delivery in virtual healthcare systems. Key recommendations include targeted training for healthcare staff, accessibility audits of virtual platforms, and policy reforms ensuring affordability and awareness of public virtual care services. Strengthening these areas can support equitable access to virtual healthcare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.