ReviewAdvances in rheumatology (London, England)2026
A narrative review on radiographic progression to monitor psoriatic arthritis activity.
Review in Advances in rheumatology (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a systemic chronic inflammatory disease characterized by arthritis and structural damage of joints associated with persistent inflammation. Radiographic progression (RP) is typically used to measure the development of structural damage using different semiquantitative scoring methods. An important therapeutic goal is to prevent structural damage. Visualizing such damage using RP seems to predict shorter survival in patients with PsA. Therapeutic agents that inhibit structural damage are considered disease-modifying in PsA. There are no validated and clinically useful biomarkers for stratifying patients and informing clinical treatment decisions to increase the likelihood of a response to any given therapy. This narrative review examines current approaches for assessing the extent of structural damage in PsA, monitoring of PsA disease activity, risk factors that contribute to the progression of RP in PsA, and discusses the efficacy (inhibition of RP) of the new approved therapies that have emerged over the last few years for use in PsA. While there are unmet needs to clarify and define RP, the extent of structural damage in the peripheral forms of PsA was most frequently determined using the PsA-modified Sharp and Sharp-van der Heijde Rheumatoid Arthritis scoring methods. Factors that lead to a more aggressive, faster, or more active RP are also related to the number of activity indicators (overweight, smoking, etc.). In patients with high psoriatic activity and thus greater disease progression, determining structural damage at 6 months of follow-up may be sufficiently sensitive to obtain RP information and evaluate the evolution of the disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.