ArticleBiomedical engineering online2026
Lung cancer multimodal auxiliary diagnosis based on entropy weight decision fusion.
Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLung cancer ranks among the most lethal malignancies globally, and its traditional diagnosis suffers from strong subjectivity, high misdiagnosis rates and uneven medical resources. To overcome the poor feature alignment caused by simply concatenating CT images and clinical text, this paper proposes a lung cancer multimodal auxiliary diagnosis model based on entropy weight decision fusion.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study enrolled 5847 participants from 2020 to 2025, comprising 1823 lung cancer cases, 2253 normal controls and 1771 pulmonary nodule controls. All CT images and corresponding reports were analyzed, and three datasets were established via random sampling from the original dataset. The study incorporated Vision Transformer (ViT) and Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) as feature extractors for images and text, respectively, to extract high-dimensional semantic features from lung CT images and CT Imaging Report. Secondly, independent classifiers based on Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) were established to convert the embedding vectors of different modalities into predicted probability distributions (Logits). Finally, the entropy weight method was employed to adaptively fuse the decision results of images and text. The model performance evaluation indicators include area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score.
resultsThe proposed method in this study can fully leverage the complementary information from CT images and imaging text multimodality. On the clinical dataset, it achieved an accuracy of 0.9375, a precision of 0.9324, a recall of 0.9322, and an F1-score of 0.9322, significantly improving diagnostic performance.
conclusionsThis study validates that, on a real-world lung cancer dataset, multimodal data decision fusion outperforms unimodal models and common fusion methods in terms of diagnostic accuracy, precision and recall. It provides a potential reference for the early auxiliary diagnosis of pulmonary nodules and lung cancer, and lays a foundation for subsequent clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.