Trial reportRespiratory research2026
The LTI-01-2001 phase 2a trial of intrapleural LTI-01 in patients with infected, non-draining pleural effusions.
Trial report in Respiratory research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04159831 (A Phase 2, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Dose-ranging Study Evaluating LTI-01), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 2, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Dose-ranging Study Evaluating LTI-01 (Single-chain Urokinase Plasminogen Activator, scuPA) in Patients With Infected, Non-draining Pleural Effusions
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSingle chain urokinase (LTI-01) intrapleural enzymatic therapy (IET) was safe and promising in a phase 1 clinical trial to overcome failed drainage in patients with pleural infection. The LTI-01-2001 phase 2a trial was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center, dose-ranging study in hospitalized subjects with infected, non-draining pleural effusions.
methodsLTI-01, in doses of 400,000, 800,000 or 1,200,000 Units, or placebo was administered intrapleurally once daily for up to 3 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was incidence of treatment failure within 7 days of starting study medication. Treatment failure was defined as requiring alternative pleural therapy irrespective of subsequent treatment. Pleural opacification was a secondary endpoint and was assessed by CT imaging of the change in opacified area expressed as a percentage of the ipsilateral hemithorax (relative change) or absolute change in pleural opacification volume expressed in liters.
results40/43 enrolled patients received LTI-01 or placebo due to constraints of the COVID-19 pandemic. There was no significant difference in incidence of treatment failure between the LTI-01 and placebo groups (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.24,4.44, P = 0.96) while two predetermined sensitivity analyses demonstrated trends of improved efficacy in the 400,000 U group (P = 0.052 and 0.147). The absolute (Liters; L) and relative change from baseline in opacity volume were - 0.28 L (p=0.035) and - 55.8% (P = 0.064) versus placebo in the 800,000 U group, with significant reduction in absolute opacification found in the 400,000 and all LTI-01-treated groups combined (P < 0.03, respectively). There were no safety signals of concern, nor were there any episodes of intrapleural or pulmonary bleeding in LTI-01-treated patients.
conclusionsNo statistically significant difference in the incidence of treatment failure was seen, potentially related to low recruitment. Trends towards efficacy were observed in predetermined sensitivity analyses at the 400,000 U dose of intrapleural LTI-01. Pleural opacification appeared most improved by the 800,000 U intrapleural LTI-01. A larger phase 2b trial is required to confirm these results or determine the efficacy of LTI-01 in patients with organizing, nondraining, infected pleural effusions.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04159831. Registration date: November 12, 2019.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.