ArticleInternational journal of nursing practice2026
Uncovering Hidden Patterns of Stigma Amongst Older Men With Urinary Incontinence: A Latent Profile Analysis.
Article in International journal of nursing practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Correction to "Uncovering Hidden Patterns of Stigma Amongst Older Men With Urinary Incontinence: A Latent Profile Analysis".International journal of nursing practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUrinary incontinence (UI) stigma significantly impacts older men's mental well-being, yet individual experiences vary. Current research frequently overlooks the heterogeneity of these stigma experiences. Addressing this gap, this study identifies stigma-influencing factors and uncovers distinct subgroups to inform targeted psychological strategies.
methodsA cross-sectional study conducted from November 2023 to February 2024 included a convenience sample of 243 older men with urinary incontinence from two hospitals in Guangdong, China. Data were collected via a demographic questionnaire and the Stigma Scale for Chronic Illness. Latent profile analysis identified distinct stigma subgroups. Furthermore, Pearson correlation and multiple linear regression were utilized to evaluate demographic and clinical differences across subgroups and identify influencing factors.
resultsEducation, UI severity and type and water/tea intake significantly influenced stigma (p < 0.05). LPA revealed the following four subgroups: (1) 'High Self-Stigma & High Perceived Stigma' (34.4%); (2) 'Internal-Sensitive & External-Resilient' (40.2%); (3) 'Moderate Stigma' (15.0%); and (4) 'Low Stigma' (10.4%). Demographic and clinical characteristics differed significantly across these profiles.
conclusionOur findings suggest that older men with UI may exhibit four distinct stigma profiles. Recognizing these patterns could inform customized psychological support, potentially advancing a precision health approach aimed at improving care efficacy and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.