ArticleBMC medical education2026
Professionalism and mental health in medical and nursing students under prolonged virtual learning: a longitudinal study in Peru.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAfter at least one year of virtual learning due to COVID‑19, medical and nursing faculties varied in their return to in‑person training. The absence of in‑person environments may have affected professionalism components such as empathy, teamwork, and lifelong learning abilities, while also impacting students' mental health and wellbeing. The objective of this study was to measure that effect.
methodsA longitudinal study was conducted from 2020 to 2023 in the five medical and nursing faculties of Cusco, Peru. Two cohorts were followed: one with prolonged exposure to virtual learning and another with shorter exposure before resuming in‑person activities. Empathy (JSE), teamwork (JSAPNC), lifelong learning (JeffSPLL), depression (PHQ‑9), anxiety (GAD‑7), wellbeing (SWLS), and family loneliness (SELSA) were assessed with validated instruments, together with sociodemographic and academic variables. Analyses included reliability testing, paired and independent group comparisons, and multivariate regression models.
resultsA total of 417 students (233 medicine) completed both assessments; 137 (33%) had prolonged virtual exposure. Wellbeing was positively associated with lifelong learning, age, and shorter virtual exposure, but inversely with empathy and family loneliness. Risk of depression decreased with teamwork and in nursing students but increased in those enrolled in the clinical phase at baseline. Anxiety was associated with greater family loneliness, while a history of severe COVID‑19 illness was associated with lower risk. Students with shorter virtual exposure improved in empathy, teamwork, and learning abilities, whereas those with prolonged exposure did not.
conclusionsThese findings indicate that prolonged reliance on virtual learning undermines professionalism‑related competencies, which are important for students' mental health and wellbeing. They also highlight the role of family support and the need for medical education to balance technology with in‑person training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.