Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42310675›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR2026

CDK4-selective inhibitor AU2-94 for the treatment of advanced and therapy-resistant prostate cancer.

Ava Safaroghli-Azar, Travis Croft, Laychiluh B Mekonnen, Jimma Lenjisa, Maja Dickel, Raj K Shrestha, Samyukta Sita, Nicholas Choo, Michael Roach, Sunita K C Basnet and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ava Safaroghli-AzarDrug Discovery and Development, School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, College of Health, Adelaide University, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.
Travis CroftFlinders University, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia.
Laychiluh B MekonnenDrug Discovery and Development, School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, College of Health, Adelaide University, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.
Jimma LenjisaDrug Discovery and Development, School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, College of Health, Adelaide University, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.
Maja DickelFlinders University, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia.
Raj K ShresthaFlinders University, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia.
Samyukta SitaMelbourne Urological Research Alliance, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia.
Nicholas ChooMelbourne Urological Research Alliance, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia.
Michael RoachFlinders University, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia.
Sunita K C BasnetDrug Discovery and Development, School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, College of Health, Adelaide University, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.
Mitchell G LawrenceMelbourne Urological Research Alliance, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3800, Australia.
Luke A SelthFlinders University, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute, Bedford Park, SA, 5042, Australia. luke.selth@flinders.edu.au.
Shudong WangDrug Discovery and Development, School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, College of Health, Adelaide University, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia. shudong.wang@adelaide.edu.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6225-5525

Funding

Cancer Australia 2020_PdCCRS_2001432 and 2023_PCRS_0269Cancer Council NSW Project Grants RG 23-04 and RG 25-13Hospital Research Foundation C-PJ-126-Exper-2019 and 2022-CP-IDMH-019National Health and Medical Research Council 2047980
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCDK4-selective inhibitors are emerging as promising anticancer agents. Relative to dual CDK4/6 inhibitors, CDK4-selective inhibitors have the potential to retain efficacy while improving tolerability. However, the therapeutic value and mechanistic consequences of selectively targeting CDK4 in prostate cancer remain largely undefined. Here, we investigated the anti-tumour activity and mode of action of the CDK4 inhibitors AU2-94 and atirmociclib across diverse prostate cancer models.

methodsAntiproliferative activity was assessed in a panel of AR-driven and AR-independent prostate cancer cell lines spanning hormone-sensitive and castration-resistant states. Efficacy was further evaluated in organoids derived from patient-derived xenografts and in xenograft mouse models. Biochemical and molecular analyses were performed to evaluate CDK4 selectivity, RB pathway engagement, transcriptional reprogramming, and downstream effects on cell-cycle regulation, and resistance-associated programmes. AU2-94 was also tested in combination with standard-of-care therapies (enzalutamide and docetaxel) and the PI3K inhibitor alpelisib.

resultsAU2-94 exhibited greater selectivity for CDK4 compared with atirmociclib. AU2-94 suppressed proliferation across prostate cancer models irrespective of AR status and retained activity in aggressive and therapy-resistant settings. In RB-proficient in vitro models, AU2-94 reduced RB phosphorylation, attenuated E2F1-dependent transcriptional outputs, activated AR signalling, and decreased expression of proliferation-associated factors such as FOXM1. In vivo, AU2-94 inhibited the growth of both AR-driven (LNCaP) and AR-independent (PC3) xenografts and suppressed RB pathway signalling. Moreover, AU2-94 demonstrated additive or synergistic effects when combined with enzalutamide, docetaxel, or alpelisib that were associated with reinforced cell-cycle blockade and suppression of resistance-associated signalling.

conclusionThese findings establish selective CDK4 inhibition as a therapeutically active and mechanistically rational strategy in prostate cancer and support AU2-94 as a candidate for further preclinical and clinical development, including in combination regimens for advanced and therapy-resistant disease.

Indexed as

Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Drug Resistance, NeoplasmProstatic NeoplasmsProtein Kinase InhibitorsAnimalsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationHumansMaleMiceXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysCDK4 protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinase 4Protein Kinase InhibitorsAU2-94, atirmociclib, prostate cancerCDK4 inhibitorCRPCDocetaxelEnzalutamide

Identifiers

PMID42310675
PMCPMC13520305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.