ArticleBMC health services research2026
The impact of managerial styles on medical service quality in Romanian public hospitals: a study of accreditation and performance.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The quality of medical services in public hospitals is significantly influenced by managerial styles, which shape organizational efficiency, patient satisfaction, and hospital accreditation outcomes. This study examines the impact of managerial leadership styles and organizational characteristics on accreditation performance in Romanian public hospitals. Using survey data from hospital managers, the study employs a structured analytical approach combining Chi-square tests and cross-tabulations, Kendall's Tau correlations, the Kruskal-Wallis H test, ordinal regression modeling, and exploratory K-means cluster analysis to examine how hospital size, managerial education, employee consultation, team motivation, and access to information are associated with accreditation outcomes. Results indicate that hospital administration type, field of study, and team motivation are significant predictors of accreditation success, while hospital size negatively correlates with accreditation scores, suggesting larger hospitals face greater challenges in meeting accreditation standards. Conversely, employee consultation and information transparency show no statistically significant impact on accreditation performance. These findings highlight the critical role of managerial education and team engagement in achieving higher accreditation outcomes. Strengthening leadership training and team-based quality initiatives could enhance accreditation performance in public hospitals. Policy makers should prioritize managerial development programs and strategic leadership approaches to improve healthcare quality and compliance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.