ArticleBMC surgery2026
An improved surgical technique for penoscrotal transposition: the penile upward migration method.
Article in BMC surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionPenoscrotal transposition(PST) is a congenital malformation often associated with hypospadias. Conventional techniques, such as the scrotal M-shaped flap method and buttonhole technique, are limited by significant trauma, compromised blood supply, or unsatisfactory cosmetic outcomes. The "penile upward migration method", derived from the buttonhole technique, has been used clinically since February 2018 in our center to correct PST. It is based on the therapeutic principle of the buttonhole technique. This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of a novel "penile upward migration method" for correcting PST.
methodsA retrospective case series study was conducted on patients who underwent surgery using the penile upward migration method between January 2018 and June 2023. During the operation, a larger circle is marked around the penile base, while a smaller concentric circle is marked and excised to allow upward penile migration. This technique can be used for isolated PST, residual PST after hypospadias repair, or simultaneous correction of PST and hypospadias. Data on demographics, operative details, complications, and postoperative cosmetic outcomes were collected and analyzed.
resultsA total of 35 patients (29 with partial and 6 with complete PST) were included in the study. The mean age was 51.6 months. Thirty-two patients underwent PST correction alone (average operative time: 70.36 ± 9.76 min), while 3 patients underwent simultaneous correction with hypospadias repair (average operative time: 156.67 ± 21.86 min). Postoperative follow-up averaged 13.6 months. Complete correction was achieved in 33 cases. Complications included one case of partial skin necrosis at the penile root and two cases of hypertrophic scarring, all of which resolved with subsequent treatment. Caregivers reported high satisfaction with the postoperative penile and scrotal appearance based on the modified Pediatric Penile Perception Score (PPPS).
conclusionThe penile upward migration method is a safe and effective way of correcting PST. This surgical procedure is also simpler than the buttonhole method. It offers advantages of shorter operative time, minimal impact on penile blood supply, and aesthetically pleasing results with hidden scars. However, further comparative studies are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.