ArticleBMC medicine2026
Changes in olfactory function in children and adolescents with obesity following an inpatient weight loss program: a longitudinal study.
Article in BMC medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundObesity is a major global public health burden, yet the mechanisms underlying interindividual variability in treatment response remain poorly understood. Olfactory function influences eating behavior and may differ in individuals with obesity. However, evidence in pediatric populations is limited, and their responsiveness to weight loss remains unclear. This study aimed to assess olfactory function in children and adolescents with obesity before and after an inpatient weight loss intervention. Specifically, we examined whether olfactory performance is within normative values and whether it changes in response to weight reduction.
methodsSixty children and adolescents with overweight or obesity (13.0 ± 1.9 years, BMI z-score: 2.5 ± 0.5) underwent a structured inpatient rehabilitation program (mean duration: 38 ± 10 days) integrating nutrition therapy, physical activity, stress management, and behavioral modification. Olfactory function was assessed at baseline (T1, ~ 7 days after admission) and after the intervention (T2, ~ 27 days after T1) using the Sniffin' Sticks Test©, comprising odor threshold, discrimination, and identification. At both time points, participants self-reported their perceived olfactory ability.
resultsAt T1, data were available for 59 participants; 50 completed the follow-up assessment at T2. Completers showed significant reductions in body weight and BMI z-score (p < .001). Olfactory function at T1 was largely within the normative range when compared with age-matched reference data. During weight loss, olfactory function remained largely stable: odor identification improved modestly (p = .003), whereas odor threshold and discrimination showed no significant changes and were not associated with weight loss. Self-reported olfactory ability showed weak correspondence with objective measures and remained unchanged.
conclusionsOlfactory function in children and adolescents with obesity was largely within the normative range and showed limited change during short-term inpatient weight loss. These findings suggest that olfactory alterations may not be a primary determinant of short-term treatment response. However, age- and domain-specific variability may still be relevant for how individuals perceive and respond to food-related cues, with potential implications for dietary adherence and long-term weight management. Future studies with normal-weight control groups should examine whether such variability contributes to differences in eating behavior and long-term outcomes.
trial registrationDRKS00005122.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.