ArticleBMC nursing2026
Nurses' perspectives on the influence of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols on postoperative recovery after emergency laparotomy: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEmergency laparotomy carries high postoperative morbidity and mortality, requiring coordinated perioperative care to optimize recovery. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols improve outcomes in elective surgery; however, their implementation in emergency settings remains complex. Limited evidence explores how nurses perceive and operationalize ERAS in high-acuity contexts. This study aimed to examine nurses' perspectives on the influence of ERAS protocols on postoperative recovery following emergency laparotomy in tertiary care.
methodsA qualitative descriptive design was employed, grounded in a constructivist-informed, descriptive epistemological orientation. Twenty registered nurses from surgical wards, intensive care units [ICU], high-dependency units [HDU], and post-anesthesia care units [PACU] in two tertiary government teaching hospitals in the Al-Ahsa region, Saudi Arabia, participated in semi-structured interviews. Participants had direct experience caring for patients undergoing emergency laparotomy and exposure to ERAS related practices. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. The study adhered to SRQR guidelines. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of King Faisal University.
resultsFour interrelated themes were identified: (1) ERAS as a structured recovery roadmap providing measurable milestones; (2) balancing protocol and patient instability through adaptive modification; (3) nursing advocacy and clinical judgment as central mediators of implementation; and (4) system constraints, including staffing and institutional variability, shaping consistency. These findings informed the Adaptive ERAS Implementation Model, conceptualizing ERAS enactment as a dynamic, nurse-mediated and context-dependent process.
conclusionsERAS implementation in emergency laparotomy is adaptive rather than checklist-driven. Its effectiveness depends on nursing leadership, interdisciplinary collaboration, and organizational support. Strengthening these elements may enhance sustainable recovery pathways in high-acuity surgical settings. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.