ArticleBMC emergency medicine2026
Crowding in real-time: an artificial intelligence-based model to manage crowding in the emergency department (CRAMMED Study).
Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEmergency department (ED) crowding is a global challenge with adverse effects on patient outcomes and staff well-being. Traditional crowding scores, such as the National ED Overcrowding Study (NEDOCS) score, have limited ability to predict imminent crowding. The aim of this study is to develop and validate a real-time, artificial intelligence (AI)-driven prediction model using a long short-term memory (LSTM) neural network to predict ED crowding, using ambulance diversion status as the reference standard and comparing performance with the (modified) NEDOCS score.
methodsIn this single-centre, retrospective cohort study, we extracted parameters related to crowding from electronic health records and workforce data. Ambulance diversion status served as the reference standard for crowding. The LSTM model was trained and evaluated with walk-forward validation and performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Model calibration was assessed using Brier score and expected calibration error (ECE).
resultsThe optimal LSTM model used the previous hour of data to predict one hour ahead, yielding an AUC of 0.84 (95% CI 0.81-0.86). Key features contributing to the predictive quality of our model included the number of pre-notified arrivals, patients in the yellow and orange triage categories, and the number of ED supervisors. Compared with the modified NEDOCS score (AUC of 0.73 (95% CI 0.70-0.76)), the LSTM model showed higher discriminative performance in internal validation within this single-centre study.
conclusionsOur AI-driven prediction model demonstrated good predictive performance for ED crowding in internal validation. These findings highlight the potential of real-time prediction models to support ED clinical workflow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.