ArticleScientific reports2026
Ink detection from surface topography of the Herculaneum papyri.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reading the Herculaneum papyri is challenging because both the scrolls and the ink, which is carbon-based, are carbonized. In X-ray radiography and tomography, ink detection typically relies on density- or composition-driven contrast, but carbon ink on carbonized papyrus provides little attenuation contrast. Building on earlier X-ray phase contrast tomographic and microscopic observations suggesting that relief contributes to letter visibility, we show that surface morphology of written regions contains enough signal to distinguish ink from papyrus. To this end, we train a deep-learning model on three-dimensional optical profilometry of mechanically opened Herculaneum papyri to separate inked and uninked areas. Although our measurements do not show general bulk letter relief or universal roughness cues, we show that high-resolution topography alone contains a usable signal for ink detection on the collected dataset. We further quantify how lateral sampling governs learnability and how a native-resolution model behaves on coarsened inputs. Leave-one-papyrus-out transfer is heterogeneous. Diminishing segmentation performance with decreasing lateral resolution provides insight into the characteristic spatial scales that must be resolved on our dataset to exploit the morphological signal. These findings define a proof-of-concept and conditionally inform resolution needs for morphology-based reading of closed scrolls, which will also depend on the imaging modality.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.