Trial reportScientific reports2026
A randomized controlled trial of a health literacy-based digital intervention to promote postpartum recovery and self-care.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To evaluate a six-week Postpartum Comprehensive Health Intervention Program (PCHIP), a health literacy-based digital intervention designed to promote early postpartum self-care and selected recovery outcomes. This pre-registered, two-arm, single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted at Changzhou Second People's Hospital, Changzhou, China. Participants were primiparous women (mean age 29.75 years) recruited from January 25 to February 15, 2025 and enrolled within the first three days postpartum. Eighty-eight participants were randomized 1:1 using a computer-generated sequence, with allocation concealed in sealed opaque envelopes, to PCHIP plus standard education or standard education alone. PCHIP began on postpartum day 3 and lasted six weeks. Primary outcomes were eating behaviors, physical activity, and breastfeeding practices; health literacy and recovery indicators were secondary outcomes. Complete-case analyses included 82 women. ANCOVA was used for continuous outcomes with baseline values, weight-related outcomes were adjusted for baseline postpartum weight, and Fisher's exact test was used for exclusive or predominant breastfeeding. Eighty-two participants completed follow-up (PCHIP: 40/44; control: 42/44). Baseline-adjusted analyses showed lower pain (AMD = -0.698, 95% CI: -1.339 to -0.057), depression (AMD = -1.313, 95% CI: -2.398 to -0.229), anxiety (AMD = -1.357, 95% CI: -2.543 to -0.170), emotional eating (AMD = -4.421, 95% CI: -8.177 to -0.666), and external eating (AMD = -4.043, 95% CI: -7.957 to -0.129), and higher health literacy (AMD = 2.714, 95% CI: 0.032 to 5.397) and physical activity (AMD = 0.969, 95% CI: 0.227 to 1.711) in the PCHIP group. Restrained eating showed a favorable but non-significant trend. Weight-related analyses adjusted for baseline postpartum weight showed greater weight reduction in the PCHIP group (AMD = 2.527 kg, 95% CI: 0.835 to 4.218). Outcomes measured only at 6 weeks suggested shorter red lochia duration (MD = -1.224 weeks, 95% CI: -1.811 to -0.638), better selected pelvic floor muscle indicators, and more frequent exclusive or predominant breastfeeding (risk difference = 22.6%, 95% CI: 2.4% to 42.8%) in the PCHIP group. No adverse events were reported. PCHIP may support early postpartum self-care and selected recovery outcomes, but findings should be interpreted cautiously because of the single-center design, small sample, complete-case analysis, short follow-up, and multiple outcomes. Larger multicenter trials with longer follow-up are needed. The trial was prospectively registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2500096473) on January 24, 2025.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.