Trial reportScientific reports2026
Effect of different positions of lumbar traction on pain, function, and range of motion in adults with non-specific low back pain: a randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06812338 (Effect of Different Positions During Traction on Pain, Function, and Range of Motion in Adults with Non-specific Low Back Pain), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effect of Different Positions During Traction on Pain, Function, and Range of Motion in Adults with Non-specific Low Back Pain
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) represents about 80-95% of all LBP cases, yet the optimal lumbar traction position for effective treatment remains debated. To investigate the effect of different positions during lumbar traction on pain, function, and ROM in adults with NSLBP. Thirty participants were randomly allocated to one of three lumbar traction position groups: supine, side-lying, or prone. Outcome measures included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), International Physical Activity Questionnaire short form (IPAQ-SF), Finger-to-Floor Test (FFT), and Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). Measurements were obtained at baseline, after the third session, and after completion of the 3-week intervention. Within-group analysis showed significant improvements in ODI and NPRS scores over time in all three groups (p < 0.001). The supine group demonstrated earlier within-group improvement after the third session (p = 0.012). IPAQ improved significantly only in the side-lying group (p = 0.01), whereas FFT did not show significant changes in any group (p > 0.05). However, between-group analysis revealed no statistically significant differences among the three traction positions at any measurement point for any outcome (p > 0.05). Lumbar traction was associated with improvements in pain and disability regardless of position. However, no traction position demonstrated superiority over the others. The earlier improvement observed in the supine group should be interpreted cautiously because it was based on within-group change rather than between-group superiority. Future studies with larger samples are needed to clarify whether positional differences are clinically meaningful. Also, these findings are limited to male participants and should not be generalized to female populations.Trial registration: The trial was registered on 02/02/2025, clinicaltrials.gov, Identifier: (NCT06812338).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.