ArticleScientific reports2026
Based on a radiomics-clinical nomogram to predict the therapeutic effect of pulmonary cryptococcosis pneumonia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We aimed to develop a radiomics-clinical nomogram to predict the therapeutic effect of PC pneumonia. A total of 255 PC pneumonia patients (165 cases with good therapeutic effect and 90 cases with poor therapeutic effect) were retrospectively enrolled from two centers. 190 PC pneumonia patients from Center 1 were randomly divided into a training group (133 cases) and an internal validation group (57 cases) at a ratio of 7:3. The data from Center 2 were used as the external validation group (65 cases). The radiomics features selected from unenhanced CT were input into multiple machine learning models. The optimal model was obtained through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to construct the radiomics and clinical models. Combined them to build a nomogram for clinical application. These models were evaluated by ROC analysis, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA). The support vector machine was the best classifier with the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.848 in the internal validation group. Although the performance of the nomogram was similar to that of the radiomics model (AUC: 0.886 vs. 0.864; Delong test: P = 0.632), they were significantly higher than that of the clinical model (AUC: 0.886 vs. 0.730, 0.864 vs. 0.730; Delong test, P < 0.05) in the external validation group. The calibration curves and DCAs of the nomogram and radiomics models confirmed their superior predictive agreements and clinical utilities. Radiomics model and nomogram could noninvasively predict the therapeutic effect of PC pneumonia, which was beneficial for precise intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.