Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42310398›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neurology2026

Ten years of disease-modifying therapy in spinal muscular atrophy: lessons learned and future directions.

Eugenio Mercuri, Richard S Finkel, Francesco Muntoni

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eugenio MercuriPaediatric Neurology, Catholic University, Rome, Italy. eugeniomaria.mercuri@policlinicogemelli.it.
Richard S FinkelCenter for Experimental Neurotherapeutics, Department of Genomic and Translational Neuroscience, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9351-7054
Francesco MuntoniDubowitz Neuromuscular Centre, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health and Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9102-5232

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an autosomal recessive disease caused by deletions or mutations in the SMN1 gene, leading to loss of motor neurons with subsequent muscle atrophy and weakness. The disease is characterized by progression in weakness and loss of function that is only partially reduced by improved standards of care. The advent of three new therapies has dramatically changed the natural history of all SMA subtypes, including the severe and advanced type I SMA. As the first drug was approved in 2016, these therapies have been available for a decade, with a rapidly increasing collection of data demonstrating their safety and efficacy in a range of clinical trials and in the real-world setting. We critically review how the field has evolved in response to the new therapies, the long-term follow-up and the emergence of new phenotypes, and the outcome of initiating these therapies in presymptomatic individuals identified via newborn screening programmes. We also review the challenges related to the interpretation of long-term outcomes once placebo-control data end, as well as the difficulties in making decisions and interpreting the results of sequential and combinatorial therapies. Finally, we review the evolution of the existing therapies, such as intrathecal gene therapy instead of its intravenous administration, or the higher dose intrathecal antisense oligonucleotide nusinersen, and new therapeutic approaches currently being studied in clinical trials.

Indexed as

Genetic TherapyMuscular Atrophy, SpinalAnimalsHumansOligonucleotidesOligonucleotides, AntisenseSurvival of Motor Neuron 1 ProteinnusinersenOligonucleotidesOligonucleotides, AntisenseSurvival of Motor Neuron 1 Protein

Identifiers

PMID42310398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.