ArticleScientific reports2026
Choroidal thickness on optical coherence tomography as a longitudinal predictor of visual outcomes in intermediate uveitis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To assess longitudinal changes in subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) and mean choroidal thickness (MCT) in intermediate uveitis, eyes with at least one follow-up visit were included. These eyes were stratified into clinically worsened, stable, or improved based on changes in clinical parameters including Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature (SUN) classification, to evaluate their prognostic value for future best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT). Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (Heidelberg Engineering, Germany) was used to image the central macula. SFCT, MCT, and CRT were measured manually within the central 1 mm. Mixed-effects regression analysis controlling for age and sex was used to evaluate the prognostic value of SFCT and MCT regarding future BCVA and CRT. A total of 91 eyes from 52 patients were included in the analysis. While 12 eyes worsened, 62 remained stable, and 17 improved. Choroidal thickness remained stable over time, with no significant differences in SFCT or MCT change between clinical groups (p > 0.5 for all). When controlling for age and sex, both the baseline SFCT (estimate = -0.35 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.