Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42310357›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Analysis of phylogenetic signal in protein language model embeddings.

Brendonas Stakauskas, Paweł Górecki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brendonas StakauskasInstitute of Data Science and Digital Technologies, Vilnius University, 08412, Vilnius, Lithuania. brendonas.stakauskas@mif.stud.vu.lt.
Paweł GóreckiFaculty of Mathematics, Informatics and Mechanics, University of Warsaw, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein language models learn high-dimensional representations of amino acid sequences that capture structural, functional and evolutionary information without explicit modeling. In this study, we examine whether distances derived from such representations can be used for phylogenetic tree inference in a zero-shot setting. Using protein families from the PANTHER database and simulated datasets with controlled evolutionary parameters, we compare trees inferred from protein language model embedding distances to trees inferred using classical phylogenetic analysis techniques and to a transformer-based distance predictor trained under explicit evolutionary models. We show that in the zero-shot setting phylogenetic signal is largely lost when sequences are represented by one fixed-sized vector, resulting in poor recovery of tree topology and branch lengths. Accumulating distances across aligned residue-level embeddings substantially improves topological accuracy, particularly for MSA-aware models, and can even match the performance of models specifically trained to infer distances for tree inference. However, distances in protein language model embedding space do not reliably reproduce evolutionary branch lengths.

Indexed as

PhylogenyProteinsAmino Acid SequenceEvolution, MolecularProteins

Identifiers

PMID42310357
PMCPMC13369888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.