ArticleScientific reports2026
A two-stage deep-learning model using MobileNetV2 and U-Net for CT-based muscle volume assessment in total hip arthroplasty.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Preoperative muscle strength is an important predictor of functional recovery after total hip arthroplasty (THA); however, accurate assessment is difficult in patients with severe hip pain. In this study, we developed a two-stage deep-learning framework that combines slice-level classification and U-shaped convolutional neural network-based segmentation to automatically quantify periarticular and thigh muscle volumes from preoperative computed tomography (CT) images. The model was trained using CT scans from 107 patients undergoing primary THA and was validated against manual segmentation. The model was subsequently applied to an independent cohort of 58 patients to examine the associations between preoperative muscle volume indices and postoperative clinical outcomes. Automated segmentation demonstrated high agreement with manual measurements, with absolute volume errors of 1-10% and Dice coefficients exceeding 0.89 across all muscle groups. In the clinical cohort, the preoperative muscle volumes were significantly lower on the affected side than on the unaffected side. Greater preoperative volumes of the gluteus maximus, quadriceps, and hamstrings were significantly associated with postoperative hip abductor strength and Timed Up and Go test performance, whereas gluteus medius/minimus volumes showed weaker associations. These findings support the feasibility of automated CT-based muscle volumetry for objective functional assessment in THA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.