Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42310338›Full record

ArticleJournal of human hypertension2026

Invasive observation of reactive systolic blood pressure responses to upper-arm cuff inflation.

Louisa F Morris, Matthew K Armstrong, James E Sharman, Martin G Schultz, J Andrew Black, Nathan B Dwyer, Philip Roberts-Thomson, Heath Adams, Stéphane G Carlier, Dean S Picone

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Louisa F Morris *Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
Matthew K Armstrong *Department of Exercise Science, Falk College of Sport, Syracuse University, Syracuse, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3948-2452
James E SharmanMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2792-0811
Martin G SchultzMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3458-1811
J Andrew BlackMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
Nathan B DwyerMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
Philip Roberts-ThomsonRoyal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5777-6331
Heath AdamsMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
Stéphane G CarlierUniversity of Mons (UMons), Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cardiology, Mons, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7787-1937
Dean S PiconeSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. dean.picone@sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4760-1634

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-invasive blood pressure (BP) measurement is performed by the inflation of an upper-arm cuff, which itself could induce a reactive BP response and potentially influence BP management. The aim of this study was to determine if cuff inflation was associated with reactive BP responses. Beat-to-beat invasive aortic BP was measured continuously before and during inflation of an automated upper-arm cuff in 234 participants (61 ± 10 years, 31% female) undergoing coronary angiography. Reactive responses were calculated as invasive aortic systolic BP immediately post cuff inflation minus baseline aortic systolic BP immediately pre-cuff inflation. Three groups were defined based on an increase (≥ 5 mmHg), decrease (≤ -5 mmHg) or no response (>-5-<5 mmHg) in aortic systolic BP. Cuff inflation was associated with an average increase in aortic systolic BP of 9.8 ± 5.1 mmHg in 28 (12%) participants, an average decrease of 9.2 ± 5.4 mmHg in 43 (18%) participants, and no response in 163 (70%) participants (-0.3 ± 2.4 mmHg). Cuff and baseline aortic systolic BP were higher in participants who exhibited a reactive response and BP variability was greater among the decrease group (ANOVA p < 0.05). No clinical characteristics were associated with reactive responses. Similar findings were observed for diastolic BP, mean arterial pressure and pulse pressure. Approximately one-third of participants exhibited a substantial reactive systolic BP response (increase or decrease) to upper-arm cuff inflation as determined from invasive BP measurements. Whether this could influence the accuracy of cuff BP measures, and consequent hypertension management, should be determined in future, prospectively designed studies.

Indexed as

ArmArterial PressureBlood PressureBlood Pressure DeterminationHypertensionAgedCoronary AngiographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSystole

Identifiers

PMID42310338
PMCPMC13457076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.