ArticleScientific reports2026
An AI-driven framework for diabetic foot ulcer classification, segmentation, and depth estimation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetic Foot Ulcers are a severe complication of diabetes that can lead to infection, amputation, and increased mortality, making timely and objective assessment essential. Conventional evaluation relies primarily on visual inspection and manual measurements, which are often subjective and inconsistent. This paper presents a comprehensive automated deep learning-based framework for DFU assessment that integrates classification, segmentation, relative depth estimation, and explainability. An EfficientNet-B0 model is employed for binary classification of ulcerated versus healthy skin. At the same time, a U-Net with an EfficientNet-B0 encoder is used for precise delineation of ulcer boundaries, enabling quantitative morphometric analysis such as area and width estimation. Model interpretability is incorporated through Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping and Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations, providing visual insights into the decision-making process. To characterize wound topology, relative pseudo-depth maps are generated from single RGB images using a MiDaS-based monocular depth estimation approach. Finally, an automated reporting module synthesizes outputs from all components into structured, clinician-friendly summaries. Experimental results demonstrate strong classification performance, accurate segmentation, and meaningful characterization of relative depth, highlighting the potential of the proposed framework as a research-oriented AI-assisted decision-support tool for DFU assessment. However, further clinical validation involving expert clinicians and prospective studies is required before real-world clinical deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.