Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42310328›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

An AI-driven framework for diabetic foot ulcer classification, segmentation, and depth estimation.

Saswati Debnath, Daniel Willson, Renukadevi M N, Shreenidhi H S, Jaydeep Kishore, Rohit Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Saswati DebnathCentre of excellence-Computer Vision, Alliance School of Advanced Computing, Alliance University, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Daniel WillsonCentre of excellence-Computer Vision, Alliance School of Advanced Computing, Alliance University, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Renukadevi M NDepartment of Computer Science, Dayananda Sagar University, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Shreenidhi H SCentre of excellence-Computer Vision, Alliance School of Advanced Computing, Alliance University, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Jaydeep KishoreSchool of Computer Science, University of Petroleum and Energy Studies (UPES), Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India.
Rohit SinghSchool of CSE, Manipal University Jaipur, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India. rohit.singh@jaipur.manipal.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetic Foot Ulcers are a severe complication of diabetes that can lead to infection, amputation, and increased mortality, making timely and objective assessment essential. Conventional evaluation relies primarily on visual inspection and manual measurements, which are often subjective and inconsistent. This paper presents a comprehensive automated deep learning-based framework for DFU assessment that integrates classification, segmentation, relative depth estimation, and explainability. An EfficientNet-B0 model is employed for binary classification of ulcerated versus healthy skin. At the same time, a U-Net with an EfficientNet-B0 encoder is used for precise delineation of ulcer boundaries, enabling quantitative morphometric analysis such as area and width estimation. Model interpretability is incorporated through Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping and Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations, providing visual insights into the decision-making process. To characterize wound topology, relative pseudo-depth maps are generated from single RGB images using a MiDaS-based monocular depth estimation approach. Finally, an automated reporting module synthesizes outputs from all components into structured, clinician-friendly summaries. Experimental results demonstrate strong classification performance, accurate segmentation, and meaningful characterization of relative depth, highlighting the potential of the proposed framework as a research-oriented AI-assisted decision-support tool for DFU assessment. However, further clinical validation involving expert clinicians and prospective studies is required before real-world clinical deployment.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDiabetic FootConvolutional Neural NetworksDeep LearningHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedIntelligent SystemsComputer-aided diagnosisDeep learningDiabetic foot ulcerExplainable AIHybrid modelMedical imagingMulti-class classificationTransformer

Identifiers

PMID42310328
PMCPMC13275734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.