ArticleScientific reports2026
Performance-driven utilization of industrial wastes as fine aggregates in ambient-cured alkali activated concrete.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rapid urbanization and the growing demand for sustainable construction materials have encouraged the development of low-carbon alkali-activated concrete (AAC). This study investigates the utilization of finely burnt clay brick dust (BD) and waste foundry sand (WFS) as alternative fine aggregates in ambient-cured cement-free AAC. Natural river sand was replaced from 25 to 100% using BD and WFS to evaluate their influence on fresh, mechanical, and durability properties. The binder system consisted of Class-F fly ash and ground granulated blast furnace slag, activated using an 8 M sodium-based alkaline solution with a constant solution-to-binder ratio of 0.50. Results indicated that incorporation of BD reduced compressive strength due to its porous structure and higher water absorption, with reductions of 18.3% and 24.2% at 28 and 90 days, respectively, at full replacement. In contrast, WFS significantly enhanced the performance of AAC because of its micro-filler effect and improved particle packing. The optimum performance was achieved at 50% WFS replacement, where compressive strength increased by 41.5% and 21.5% at 28 and 90 days, respectively, while split tensile and flexural strengths also improved considerably. Durability performance was substantially enhanced at the optimum WFS level, with reductions of 60.9% in chloride penetrability, 62.7% in carbonation depth, 45.7% in water permeability, and 42% in sorptivity compared to the control mix. Furthermore, the 50WFS mix exhibited superior resistance against acidic and sulfate environments. The findings demonstrate that WFS can effectively replace natural sand up to 50% in ambient-cured AAC, producing a sustainable and durable construction material, while BD can be utilized at moderate replacement levels for effective waste valorization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.