ArticleNPJ breast cancer2026
Predicting early-stage breast cancer disease-free survival and adjuvant therapy benefit from multimodal information using deep learning.
Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate prediction of disease-free survival (DFS) is essential for tailoring adjuvant regimens and improving clinical outcomes in early-stage breast cancer (EBC). A multimodal deep learning model (Mu-model) based on deep canonical correlation analysis (DCCA) integrating multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-including dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)-with clinical text data is developed to predict DFS and identify patients likely to benefit from adjuvant therapy. This multicenter retrospective study includes 1,120 patients with EBC (training cohort, n = 459; external validation cohort, n = 661). The Mu-model achieves concordance index (C-index) values of 0.742 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.662-0.821) in the training cohort (TC) and 0.735 (95% CI: 0.667-0.803) in the external validation cohort (EVC) for DFS. The Mu-model score (MuS) remains an independent prognostic factor after adjustment for clinicopathologic variables (all P < 0.05). In human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive, hormone receptor (HR)-positive, and T2-stage subgroups, a significant survival benefit associated with adjuvant therapy was observed in patients with low MuS, whereas no statistically significant association was detected in patients with high MuS. Transcriptomic analysis in 19 patients indicates that high MuS is associated with immune activation and enrichment of cell-cycle and purine-metabolism pathways. The Mu-model provides non-invasive DFS prediction and recurrence risk stratification, while preliminarily exploring its potential to identify patients who may derive differential benefits from adjuvant therapy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.