ArticleSpine deformity2026
Lumbar vertebral body tethering: 2-year multicenter radiographic and reoperation outcomes.
Article in Spine deformity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study evaluates radiographic outcomes and reoperations in patients undergoing anterior vertebral body tethering (VBT) of the lumbar spine.
methodsA retrospective review of an EOS database identified pediatric patients who underwent lumbar VBT. Demographic and surgical data were collected, as well as radiographic and clinical outcomes including complications, reoperations, and conversion to posterior spinal fusion (PSIF). Analyses included paired t-tests, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and chi-square.
resultsThirty-two patients with idiopathic scoliosis who underwent thoracolumbar VBT with 2-year follow-up were included. Mean age at surgery was 13.7 ± 1.8 years (mean follow-up 2.0 ± 0.2 years); median Sanders score was 3 (50% ≤ 3). Lumbar Cobb decreased from 48° ± 12 to 20° ± 10 postoperatively (p < 0.001) with correction loss to 29° ± 12 at 2 years (p < 0.001). Tethered Cobb decreased from 46° ± 8 to 13° ± 9 postoperatively (p < 0.001), with correction loss to 17° ± 12 at 2 years (p = 0.284). At 2 years, 31% had > 5° of correction loss and 84% had a tethered Cobb < 30°. Correction loss did not differ by Sanders stage (p = 0.92). Seven patients (23.3%) demonstrated > 5° of additional curve correction postoperatively. Four patients (12.5%) had unplanned reoperation and five others (15.6%) required PSIF: 28.1% total reoperation rate.
conclusionsLumbar VBT provided substantial initial correction with maintenance of correction across the tethered levels at 2-year follow-up. While most patients maintained a tethered Cobb angle < 30° at 2 years, 28.1% of patients underwent reoperation (12.5% UPROR; 15.6% PSIF conversion). Longer follow-up in larger multicenter cohorts is required to more accurately define lumbar VBT durability and conversion-to-fusion risk. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42310286What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.