ArticleIrish journal of medical science2026
A service evaluation of regional anaesthesia utilisation in an Irish paediatric tertiary referral centre.
Article in Irish journal of medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPaediatric regional anaesthesia (RA) is a safe and effective modality for peri-operative pain management, associated with improved outcomes and reduced opioid use. However, utilisation remains variable, and defining appropriate benchmarks is challenging.
methodsWe conducted a 28-day retrospective audit of RA practice in a tertiary paediatric centre. All anaesthesiologist-performed regional blocks were recorded. Surgical cases not typically amenable to RA were excluded. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients receiving RA, with secondary analysis excluding unsuitable procedures.
resultsA total of 491 patients underwent surgery, of whom 94 (19.1%) received RA, increasing to 20.8% following case exclusion. A total of 117 blocks were performed, comprising 86 peripheral (73.5%) and 31 central (26.5%) blocks. Peripheral techniques included 42 lower limb (35.9%), 30 truncal/craniofacial (25.6%), and 14 upper limb (12.0%) blocks. Central blocks included 15 caudal (12.8%), 10 epidural (8.5%), and 6 paravertebral (5.2%) blocks.
conclusionRA utilisation in our institution is consistent with European data. These findings establish a local benchmark and support ongoing audit and quality improvement in paediatric anaesthesia practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42310280What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.