ArticleGeneral thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2026
Weather-related triggers of acute aortic dissection: a case-crossover study of 293 patients.
Article in General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Re: Weather-related triggers of acute aortic dissection-a case-crossover study of 293 patients.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study utilized a case-crossover design to assess the acute, transient trigger effect of weather-related factors on acute aortic dissection (AAD) onset, while inherently controlling for all stable individual-level confounders.
methodsThis retrospective, single-center case-crossover study included 293 consecutive patients with AAD treated at a tertiary care center between January 2019 and December 2021. For each patient, the day of AAD onset (case period) was compared with the seven preceding days (control periods). Daily weather-related data, including mean temperature and day-to-day temperature change, were obtained. Conditional logistic regression analysis was performed to estimate the acute risk of AAD onset associated with weather-related variables, allowing for the matching of patient-specific, time-invariant factors.
resultsMultivariate conditional logistic regression analysis identified two weather-related factors independently associated with AAD onset: mean temperature and the change in minimum temperature from the previous day. A decrease in mean temperature significantly increased the risk of AAD; the risk increased by 1.13 times (95% CI: 1.06-1.20) for every 1℃ decrease in mean temperature. Similarly, a larger drop in minimum temperature from the previous day acutely increased the risk; the risk increased by 1.04 times (95% CI: 1.01-1.08) for every 1 ℃ decrease in minimum temperature from the previous day.
conclusionsThe onset of AAD is acutely triggered by low mean temperature and a significant drop in minimum temperature from the previous day, independent of individual patient risk factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42310275What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.