Trial reportBreast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)2026
Prognosis of ER-positive, HER2-negative postmenopausal early breast cancer patients based on response to neoadjuvant endocrine therapy and multigene assay results: findings from the NEOS trial.
Trial report in Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWe previously reported the 21-gene Oncotype DX® assay results from TransNEOS in patients enrolled in the phase 3 NEOS trial. However, the association between assay results and long-term prognosis has remained unclear.
methodsOf the 296 patients registered in TransNEOS, 226 patients were enrolled in this study. Multigene assay results were categorized into three groups based on Recurrence Score® (RS): RS low < 11, RS intermediate 11-25, RS high > 25. Kaplan-Meier methods evaluated the association between RS results and DDFS and OS across treatments and clinical response to neoadjuvant endocrine treatment (NET).
resultsThe clinical efficacy of NET was judged as CR, PR, and SD in 4 (1.8%), 113 (50%), and 109 (48.2%) patients, respectively. In the RS low and intermediate groups, no statistically significant difference in DDFS or OS was observed between the endocrine therapy (ET) alone group and the chemoendocrine therapy (CT + ET) group. In the RS high group, OS was significantly lower in the ET group compared to the CT + ET group (p = 0.037). Among patients in the RS high group who achieved CR + PR response to NET, there was no significant difference in OS between the CT + ET group and the ET alone group (p = 0.25). However, the number of events was limited, and the study may have been underpowered to detect a meaningful difference.
conclusionsThe need for chemotherapy in postmenopausal HR + , HER2- breast cancer patients might be further informed by integrating the results of the Oncotype DX test with the response to NET.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.