ReviewAlimentary pharmacology & therapeutics2026
Review Article: Implementation Challenges in Helicobacter pylori Management: Bridging Evidence and Real-World Practice.
Review in Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Editorial: H. pylori Guidelines: To Implement and How-That Is the Question.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2026Article
- Editorial: H. pylori Guidelines: To Implement and How-That Is the Question. Authors' Reply.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2026Article
- Review Article: Implementation Challenges in Helicobacter pylori Management: Bridging Evidence and Real-World Practice.Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2026Review
- Synthesis, Antibacterial Evaluation, and Chemometric Profiling of a Vanilloid-Based Compounds Library Active AgainstAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite increasingly refined diagnostic strategies and regularly updated treatment guidelines, real-world outcomes of Helicobacter pylori management remain variable. Antimicrobial resistance alone does not fully explain these discrepancies, suggesting important challenges in the implementation of evidence-based care.
aimsTo identify recurring implementation-related challenges across the Helicobacter pylori care pathway and highlight priorities for improving real-world management.
methodsThis expert-informed review integrated relevant literature, international guideline documents, and structured international expert prioritisation. An initial list of implementation-related pitfalls was developed through literature review, clinical experience, and discussions among the coordinating authors and selected co-authors. Twenty-six experts from five continents participated in a structured consultation process and rated predefined pitfalls using a 5-point Likert scale. Median scores were used for relative prioritisation.
resultsTreatment selection and patient management emerged as the domains most consistently prioritised by participating experts. High-impact pitfalls included empirical triple therapy in high-resistance settings, inadequate patient counselling, and empirical retreatment without escalation. Additional challenges were identified across diagnostic, treatment, and follow-up domains, highlighting persistent implementation-related barriers throughout the care pathway.
conclusionsRecurring implementation-related challenges remain important barriers to optimal Helicobacter pylori management. Structured expert prioritisation highlights potential targets for improvement and supports further research and implementation-focused strategies to improve delivery of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.