ArticleRadiological physics and technology2026
Dose rate dependence of incorrect sensing and triggering of defibrillation in cardiac implantable electronic devices: single manufacturer result with kV beam.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
An incorrect triggering condition owing to irradiation of a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) with a defibrillation function has not yet reached consideration. This study aimed to experimentally examine the dose rate dependence on incorrect sensing and triggering for defibrillation, as either direct or indirect irradiation of a CIED requires numerical explanation by the dose rate. Four devices were directly irradiated by X-ray beams of 160 kV at dose rates to the device surfaces of 50- 3600 cGy/min. The devices were set to a VVI mode of 60 bpm, where the function for defibrillation was deactivated for safety reasons. Wave signals monitored on an electrocardiogram were recorded as a movie. During the 15-second irradiation time, the number and the time interval of incorrect sensing caused by irradiation were counted. The dose rate, considering the attenuation effect in the titanium case, was calculated as 11 - 800 cGy/min. It has been clearly observed that the ratio of incorrect sensing and the reach rate of incorrect triggering for defibrillation depend on the dose rate as well as on the sensing threshold level. The dose dependence was well reproduced by an error function. Extrapolation of the present result from a single manufacturer's result predicts that an incorrect triggering of shock therapy would not occur if the sensing threshold level were set at higher than 0.9 mV for X-ray kV beams at a dose rate of 600 cGy/min. This was therefore the first study of a safe condition against incorrect defibrillation caused by direct irradiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42310249What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.