ArticlePrimates; journal of primatology2026
Foraging benefits of winning intergroup encounters in colobus monkeys.
Article in Primates; journal of primatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Winners of aggressive intergroup encounters are often assumed to benefit from increased access to resources, but few studies have measured whether there is differential access to resources based on the intergroup outcome. To investigate whether winning intergroup encounters is associated with increased access to food, we used 13 months of data on intergroup dynamics, feeding by 61 females, and the phenology and spatial distributions of food trees from the home ranges of 8 groups of white-thighed black-and-white colobus (Colobus vellerosus) at Boabeng-Fiema, Ghana. Contested trees were important food species more often than expected based on the occurrence of these species in the study area. Contested trees had young leaves, fruits, and seeds more often than expected based on the presence of these plant parts on trees monitored via monthly phenology surveys. Focal females were more likely to feed on the contested tree than other trees they were in during and immediately after the intergroup encounter. Based on group scan data collected throughout the day of an intergroup encounter, the likelihood of females feeding on any food species before and during the intergroup encounter was similar regardless of the outcome. The likelihood of feeding was higher after the intergroup encounter if the group had won compared to if the group had lost. These findings indicate that groups compete over access to important food resources and winners benefit from increased access to food. Future studies should investigate whether winning intergroup encounters is associated with long-term benefits such as increased reproductive success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42310246What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.