ArticleCardiovascular and interventional radiology2026
Hepatic Encephalopathy after Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt Using Dedicated versus Generic Stent-Grafts in Cirrhotic Patients.
Article in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo compare the incidence of hepatic encephalopathy (HE) after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) using two types of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE)-covered stents: dedicated stent-graft (DSG; Viatorr) versus generic stent-graft (GSG; Fluency) in patients with cirrhosis. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of cirrhotic patients who underwent TIPS using DSGs or GSGs between January 2012 and March 2024. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to adjust for baseline differences between the two groups. The primary outcome was overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE). Secondary outcomes included shunt dysfunction and transplant-free overall survival (TF-OS).
resultsAfter matching, 320 patients were included in each group. The cumulative incidence of OHE at 1, 2, and 3 years was lower in the DSG group than in the GSG group (16.1%, 21.9%, and 26.3% vs. 26.6%, 31.3%, and 33.7%; p = 0.013). After adjustment for confounders, DSGs were independently associated with a lower risk of OHE (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.51-0.91). Shunt dysfunction was also less frequent in the DSG group (2.9%, 5.2%, and 6.8% vs. 9.8%, 18.2%, and 23.7%; p < 0.001), with DSGs independently associated with a reduced risk (sHR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.18-0.48). TF-OS did not differ significantly between the DSG and GSG groups (88.8%, 82.5%, and 76.8% vs. 90.3%, 83.1%, and 76.1%; p = 0.979).
conclusionsDSGs were associated with a lower risk of OHE and improved shunt patency compared with GSGs, supporting their preferential use in TIPS creation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42310223What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.