ArticleMolecular psychiatry2026
Opposing sensitive period effects of early and late childhood maltreatment on corticolimbic responses in fear conditioning.
Article in Molecular psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The neural mechanisms underlying fear learning are critical for survival. Childhood maltreatment increases the risk of psychopathology by disrupting these processes, yet it remains unclear whether such effects reflect the cumulative burden of maltreatment types or arise from timing-specific exposures during sensitive developmental periods. In this study, 213 young adults (18-28 years) completed the Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure (MACE), which retrospectively assesses the severity and timing of ten maltreatment types across childhood. During fMRI, participants underwent a Pavlovian fear-conditioning paradigm, allowing us to measure BOLD activation in the centromedial amygdala, basolateral amygdala, and hippocampus, as well as their functional connectivity with the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC). Using machine-learning feature selection combined with a targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE) framework, we identified the most influential type-by-age exposures and evaluated their effects on neural responses under standard causal assumptions. Two distinct windows of vulnerability emerged. Early maltreatment was associated with heightened threat-safety discrimination, reflected by stronger CS+-CS- separation in regional activation and vmPFC coupling, whereas late maltreatment was associated with blunted discrimination and reduced coupling, accompanied by relatively elevated CS- responding. Although directionally opposite, both patterns may represent adaptive phenotypes that confer heightened long-term vulnerability to psychopathology. These findings highlight sensitive periods during which maltreatment disproportionately alters corticolimbic dynamics, providing a developmental framework for timing targeted interventions to reduce mental-health risk in vulnerable youth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42310193What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.