ArticleHeredity2026
Genomic prediction of wild-derived powdery mildew resistance for strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) pre-breeding.
Article in Heredity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genomic prediction (GP) has become an essential tool for accelerating modern plant breeding, particularly for complex traits. We evaluated different GP approaches for pre-breeding in thirteen biparental strawberry families derived from crosses between Fragaria virginiana and Fragaria chiloensis, focusing on resistance to powdery mildew (PM) in both leaves and fruits. Five-fold cross-validation using Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (GBLUP) for combined-year data yielded mean predictive abilities (PAs) of 0.56 and 0.36 for leaf and fruit resistance, respectively. Family-based GBLUP analyses showed higher PAs for closely related families, ranging from 0.10 to 0.89. Simulations identified key parameters: training sets comprising 40% of the population provided stable predictions for both traits, while ≈8300 SNPs were sufficient for predicting leaf resistance. However, PA for fruit resistance remained consistently low regardless of marker density. We then compared GBLUP with a marker-assisted model that iteratively incorporated the major resistance loci as fixed effects. This strategy increased PA by ≈10-30% for leaf resistance and ≈25-47% for fruit resistance across models. We further applied cross-environment forward prediction in independent greenhouse and separate field validation trials. The GBLUP model maintained substantial PA when trained on either the full population or a 40% subset, demonstrating robustness in predicting new genotypes across distinct environments. Our findings highlight the importance of taking trait genetic architecture into account to enhance PAs for PM resistance in strawberry. Together, these results provide evidence-based thresholds for training population size and marker density, offering a framework for efficient implementation of genomic selection in strawberry pre-breeding populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.