ArticleNPJ precision oncology2026
Distinct immune microenvironment in HER2-low triple-negative breast cancer underlies inferior response to immunotherapy.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Effective predictive biomarkers for immunotherapy in breast cancer remain elusive, limiting precision treatment strategies. Although the biological significance of HER2‑low expression has gained increasing attention, its impact on immunotherapy response remains unknown. Here, we investigated the impact of HER2 expression on response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and explored the underlying biological patterns through comprehensive multi-omics analysis. A multi-center real-world cohort study revealed that HER2-low TNBC patients had poorer responses to immunotherapy than HER2-0 patients, whereas no significant difference was observed in chemotherapy alone; these findings were validated in independent prospective cohorts (ISPY-2 and NeoTRIP). Single‑cell multi‑omics further demonstrated that HER2‑low tumors exhibited reduced expression of major histocompatibility complex and immune checkpoint molecules, along with diminished T‑cell activity, relative to HER2‑0 tumors. Following immunotherapy, HER2‑low tumors showed no significant downregulation of targeted immune checkpoint molecules and less pronounced T‑cell clonal remodeling. Collectively, these findings establish HER2‑low expression as a negative predictor of immunotherapy response, shaped by a less immunogenic tumor microenvironment. These results provide important insights into the distinct immunological features of HER2‑low triple‑negative breast cancer and warrant further mechanistic and clinical investigations.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.