Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42310130›Full record

ArticleNature biomedical engineering2026

BRIDGE: benchmarking large language models for understanding real-world clinical practice texts.

Jiageng Wu, Bowen Gu, Ren Zhou, Kevin Xie, Doug Snyder, Yixing Jiang, Valentina Carducci, Richard Wyss, Rishi J Desai, Emily Alsentzer and 7 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Jiageng Wu *Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Bowen Gu *Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0739-0390
Ren ZhouSiebel School of Computing and Data Science, The Grainger College of Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
Kevin XieDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Doug SnyderDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Yixing JiangDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Valentina CarducciDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Richard WyssDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Rishi J DesaiDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0299-7273
Emily AlsentzerDepartment of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5370-1746
Leo Anthony CeliDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6712-6626
Adam RodmanDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Sebastian SchneeweissDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Jonathan H ChenStanford Division of Computational Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Santiago Romero-BrufauDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Kueiyu Joshua LinDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. jklin@bwh.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4564-3715
Jie YangDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. jyang66@bwh.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5696-363X

Funding

Stanford Center for Clinical and Translational Research and EducationUM1TR004921 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MANISHA DESAI, DEAN W FELSHER · 2024 to 2026
$30.1M
Optimizing validity of comparative effectiveness research in Alzheimer's disease and related dementias using large language modelsRF1AG090405 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI LIN, JOSHUA K, YANG, JIE · 2025 to 2025
$3.7M
Developing large language models for drug safety and effectiveness causal analysisR01LM014667 · NLM · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Jie Yang · 2025 to 2026
$806k
NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004921Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) ME-2022C1-25646U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute on Aging (U.S. National Institute on Aging) RF1AG090405U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM) R01LM014667
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are evolving rapidly and hold great promise for medical applications, yet benchmarking on real-world clinical data such as electronic health records remains limited. Most existing benchmarks rely on medical examination-style questions or PubMed-derived text, failing to capture the complexity of clinical practice, while others target specific application scenarios with limited generalizability. Here we present BRIDGE, a comprehensive multilingual benchmark comprising 87 tasks sourced from 59 real-world clinical data sources across 9 languages. It covers eight task types spanning the patient care continuum, including triage, information extraction, diagnosis, prognosis and billing coding, and involves 14 clinical specialties. We systematically evaluated 95 LLMs (including DeepSeek-R1, GPT-4o, Gemini and Qwen3) under multiple inference strategies. Results reveal substantial performance variation across model sizes, languages, natural language processing tasks and clinical specialties. Open-source LLMs can match proprietary models, while medically fine-tuned models built on older backbones often lag behind updated general-purpose LLMs. BRIDGE and its continuously updated leaderboard provide foundational resources and important references for evaluating and developing LLMs for real-world clinical text understanding.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.