Trial reportClinical oral investigations2026
Piezosurgery-assisted protocol for impacted mandibular third molar removal with 3D facial swelling analysis: a randomized split-mouth clinical trial on post-surgical sequelae.
Trial report in Clinical oral investigations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06212232 (Efficacy of a New Piezoelectric Technique in Third Molar Surgery and Evaluation of Postoperative Sequelae), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy of a New Piezoelectric Technique in Third Molar Surgery and Evaluation of Postoperative Sequelae: a Randomized Split-mouth
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis split-mouth randomized controlled trial aimed to compare a novel piezosurgery protocol versus a conventional rotary technique for the extraction of mesio-angulated and horizontally impacted mandibular third molars (MA-HM3Ms), evaluating postoperative inflammatory sequelae and patient-centered outcomes. MATERIALS AND
methodsForty-seven healthy adult patients underwent bilateral MA-HM3M extraction with piezosurgery protocol (test group, TG) and, contralaterally, with conventional rotary instruments and manual elevators (control group, CG). Facial swelling was objectively quantified using three-dimensional facial scans at 2 and 7 days postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain, maximum mouth opening, bleeding, surgical time, analgesic intake, complications, and patient-reported outcomes assessed using the PoSSe scale. Statistical analysis was performed using paired comparisons and regression models (α = 0.05).
resultsNinety-four extractions were analyzed. After 2 days, lower facial swelling was significantly reduced in TG compared with CG (p = 0.01), together with less pronounced trismus (p = 0.016). Pain was consistently lower in the TG at all timepoints, while postoperative bleeding and analgesic intake were significantly higher in the CG (p < 0.05). Surgical time was longer in TG than in CG (p < 0.001). The piezosurgery protocol significantly reduced interference with daily activities and resulted in higher patient satisfaction. Regression analyses showed a direct association between swelling and PoSSe scale in both groups. No permanent neurological complications were observed; alveolitis occurred in 3 CG and 2 TG sites.
conclusionsThis split-mouth randomized controlled trial suggests that piezosurgery for MA-HM3M extraction effectively reduces early postoperative inflammatory sequelae, improving patient-centered outcomes and quality of life, despite longer operative times. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The proposed piezoelectric protocol could represent a minimally invasive alternative to conventional rotary techniques, particularly in complex MA-HM3M extractions, enhancing patient comfort and quality of life during the most critical postoperative period while supporting a more controlled and refined surgical approach. Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov, TRN: NCT06212232, Registration date: 25 January 2024.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.