ArticleNature food2026
Cropland edge management enhances the adaptability of cropland productivity to extremely dry events.
Article in Nature food, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rapid urbanization is fragmenting periurban cropland landscapes, increasing anthropogenic disturbance at cropland edges and heightening productivity sensitivity to climate extremes. Yet how micro-scale cropland edge interactions shape productivity adaptation to hydrological extremes remains unclear. By combining high-resolution modelling with a vulnerability-resilience assessment, we found that micro-scale cropland edge interactions are critical mediators amplifying the impacts of climate on productivity. A one-standard-deviation increase in cropland edge ratio increased log-transformed vulnerability to extremely dry events by 0.981 standard deviations, whereas a one-standard-deviation increase in ecological buffer zone ratio enhanced log-transformed resilience by 3.165 standard deviations. Counterfactual simulations identified two adaptation pathways: reducing cropland edge ratio and expanding ecological buffer zones. Across Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and Representative Concentration Pathways (SSP-RCP) scenarios, the Edge-Reduction strategy consistently decreased cropland edge exposure by nearly 36%, while the Buffer-Zone strategy expanded ecological buffer zones around cropland by 12-15% from 2020 to 2060. Our analysis underscores the role of cropland edge ratio in amplifying risks to cropland productivity during extremely dry events and provides a mechanistic framework for adaptive land management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42310072What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.