ArticleScientific reports2026
A multi-task learning-based fully connected neural network for personalized news recommendation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional personalized news recommendation methods still face several limitations, such as inadequate modeling of dynamic user interests, difficulty in balancing accuracy and diversity, and significant performance degradation in cold-start scenarios. These limitations hinder their effectiveness in real-world applications. To address these issues, a Personalized News Recommendation Model via a Fully Connected Neural Network (MT-FCNN) is proposed. The model utilizes user behavior sequence embeddings to capture the dynamic evolution of user interests and adopts a multi-task learning framework that jointly optimizes click intention prediction and interest distribution learning, thereby improving recommendation performance in a unified representation space. The proposed model is evaluated on the publicly available Microsoft News Dataset and compared with established approaches, including Collaborative Filtering, Content-Based Recommendation, GRU4Rec, and Transformer-based models. Experimental results show that MT-FCNN improves AUC, NDCG@5, and CTR by 12.4%, 10.7%, and 8.9%, respectively. For cold-start users, recommendation accuracy (Precision@5) improves by 11.2%. Repeated experiments and statistical tests further confirm the model's stability and significant advantages. This integrated framework introduces a new methodological perspective for recommendation systems while offering a more efficient technological approach for modeling user behavior in dynamic environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.