ArticleScientific reports2026
Development and temporal evaluation of an emergency severity index-informed Bayesian sequential model for hospital admission prediction using time-to-urination.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Triage tools in routine emergency care are largely static and may miss simple dynamic bedside cues available after presentation. We developed and temporally evaluated an emergency severity index (ESI)-informed Bayesian sequential prediction model for hospital admission using time-to-urination (TTU) in a prospective single-center cohort of ambulance-transported emergency department patients in Japan (February-August 2025; [Formula: see text]). The outcome was hospital admission at emergency department disposition. ESI was used as the initial pretest risk layer, TTU as a dynamic updating cue, and age and sex as refinement variables. Population-level fit to the cumulative admission curve was strong. In nested model comparison, ESI alone yielded an AUROC of 0.661 (95% CI 0.640-0.680), adding TTU improved discrimination to 0.677 (95% CI 0.658-0.698), and further adjustment for age and sex yielded the best performance (AUROC 0.741, 95% CI 0.722-0.760). Recalibration improved probability alignment without materially changing discrimination. Calibration deteriorated later in the post-arrival period, suggesting that the model is most informative in the early post-arrival window. This framework is designed to augment, rather than replace, existing triage systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.