ArticleScientific reports2026
Mycorrhizal and bacterial inoculants enhance photosynthesis, water relations, and leaf thermal regulation in Vigna Radiata L. under soilless substrate culture.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plant growth-promoting microorganisms (PGPMs) and biochar are increasingly recognized as sustainable strategies to enhance crop performance; however, their comparative and integrative effects on carbon-water coordination and leaf thermal regulation under soilless substrate conditions remain poorly resolved. We investigated the physiological responses of Vigna radiata L. to bacterial biostimulant (BB), arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi, their co-inoculation (BA), and BA combined with biochar (BiB). All treatments enhanced biomass relative to the uninoculated control, but through distinct physiological mechanisms. BB reduced leaf temperature (LT) primarily via increased stomatal conductance and transpiration, supporting higher net photosynthesis. In contrast, AM enhanced plant water status, as reflected by higher relative water content, and maintained intrinsic water-use efficiency comparable to the control but greater than in the other inoculation treatments. The reduction in LT under AM, despite unchanged transpiration, may reflect differences in plant water relations rather than purely evaporative cooling. BA integrated these complementary functions, resulting in the lowest LT, and maximum biomass. BiB further enhanced photosynthetic rate and maintained intrinsic water-use efficiency, although biomass was slightly lower than in BA. Collectively, the results demonstrate that the distinct physiological roles of bacterial and mycorrhizal inoculants, stomatal-driven carbon acquisition versus hydraulic stabilization, become functionally complementary under co-inoculation, enabling coordinated regulation of carbon assimilation, water balance, and leaf thermal dynamics to maximize biomass production. By reducing leaf temperature, PGPMs could contribute to maintaining photosynthetic efficiency under potential heat stress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.